Suppression of Geometric Barrier in Type II Superconducting Strips
R. Willa, V. B. Geshkenbein, G. Blatter
arXiv:1402.4665 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.104514 · 2014-02-19 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the magnetic response of a superconducting double strip, i.e., two parallel coplanar thin strips of width $2w$, thickness $d \ll w$ and of infinite length, separated by a gap of width $2s$ and subject to a perpendicular magnetic field $H$. The magnetic properties of this system are governed by the presence of a geometric energy barrier for vortex penetration which we investigate as a function of applied field $H$ and gap parameter $s$. The new results deal with the case of a narrow gap $s \ll w$, where the field penetration from the inner edges is facilitated by large flux focusing. Upon reducing the gap width $2s$, we observe a considerable rearrangement of the screening currents, leading to a strong reduction of the penetration field and the overall magnetization loop, with a suppression factor reaching $\sim (d/w)^{1/2}$ as the gap drops below the sample thickness, $2s < d$. We compare our results with similar systems of different shapes (elliptic, rectangular platelet) and include effects of surface barriers as well. Furthermore, we verify that corrections arising from the magnetic response of the Shubnikov phase in the penetrated state are small and can be omitted. Extending the analysis to multiple strips, we determine the specific sequence of flux penetrations into the different strips. Our studies are relevant for the understanding of platelet shaped samples with cracks or the penetration into layered superconductors at oblique magnetic fields.
Similar papers
Current profiles and AC losses of a superconducting strip with elliptic cross-section in perpendicular magnetic field
similarity 0.91F. Gomory et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of geometric barrier in type-II superconducting strips
similarity 0.91R. Willa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-field effects upon the critical current density of flat superconducting strips
similarity 0.89Ali A. Babaei Brojeny & John R. Clem · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of surface barrier in superconductors by columnar defects
similarity 0.89A. E. Koshelev & V. M. Vinokur · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner response of a bulk superconductor with an embedded sheet of reduced penetration depth
similarity 0.88J. R. Kirtley et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.1032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortices in superconductors with a columnar defect: finite size effects
similarity 0.88Edson Sardella et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406400
Source status unknown — claims are unverified