Emergent transition for superconducting fluctuations in antiferromagnetic ruthenocuprates
A. C. Mclaughlin, J. P. Attfield
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.220509 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The emergence of carrier pairing from the electronically inhomogeneous phase of lightly hole-doped copper oxides has been investigated through magnetoresistance measurements on 1222-type ruthenocuprates RuSr2(R,Ce)2Cu2O10−δ, principally with R=Gd, Sm, Nd. A well-defined transition at which superconducting fluctuations emerge is discovered at a remarkably low critical doping, pc=0.0084, deep within the antiferromagnetic phase. Systematic variations of the low-temperature fluctuation density with doping and cell volume demonstrate the intrinsic nature of the electronic inhomogeneity and provide new support for bosonic models of the superconducting mechanism.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2(R,Ce)2Cu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2Gd1.8-xY0.2CexCu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2Sm1.8-xY0.2CexCu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Emergent Transition for Superconducting Fluctuations in Antiferromagnetic Ruthenocuprates
similarity 1.00A. C. Mclaughlin & J. P. Attfield · 2015 · arXiv:1503.07714
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible competition between superconductivity and magnetism in RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ ruthenocuprate compounds
similarity 0.95V. P. S. Awana et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Raman transport and magnetization study of the RuSr2R2−xCexCu2O10+δ (R=Gd,Eu) high-temperature superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.94G. V. M. Williams & M. Ryan
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetotransport study of intra- and intergrain transitions in the magnetic superconductors RuSr2GdCu2O8 and RuSr2(Gd1.5Ce0.5)Cu2O10
similarity 0.94S. García et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spontaneous vortex phase in a superconducting weak ferromagnet
similarity 0.94E. B. Sonin & I. Felner
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Ru1−xSr2GdCu2+xO8−y compounds
similarity 0.94P. W. Klamut et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified