Enhanced superconductivity at the interface of W/Sr2RuO4 point contacts
He Wang (王贺), Weijian Lou (娄伟坚), Jiawei Luo (骆佳伟), Jian Wei (危健), Y. Liu, J. E. Ortmann, Z. Q. Mao
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.184514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Differential resistance measurements are conducted for point contacts (PCs) between the Sr2RuO4 (SRO) single crystal and the tungsten tip approaching along the c axis direction of the crystal. Since the contact is made at liquid helium temperature and the tungsten tip is hard enough to penetrate through the surface layer, consistent superconducting features are observed. First, with the tip pushed towards the crystal, the zero-bias conductance peak (ZBCP) due to Andreev reflection at the normal-superconducting interface increases from 3% to more than 20%, much larger than previously reported, and extends to temperatures higher than the bulk transition temperature. Reproducible ZBCP within 0.2 mV may also help determine the gap value of SRO, on which no consensus has been reached. Second, the logarithmic background can be fitted with the Altshuler-Aronov theory of electron-electron interaction for tunneling into quasi-two-dimensional electron systems. Feasibility of such fitting confirms that spectroscopic information such as density of states is probed, and electronic temperature retrieved from such fitting can be important to analyze the PC spectra. Third, at bias much higher than 0.2 mV there are conductance dips due to the critical current effect. These dips persist up to 6.2 K, possibly due to enhanced superconductivity under uniaxial pressure.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Observation of superconducting gap spectra of long-range proximity effect in Au/SrTiO3/SrRuO3/Sr2RuO4 tunnel junctions
similarity 0.94M. S. Anwar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Chiral p-Wave Superconductivity with Near Nodes for Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.94Wan-Sheng Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting subphase in the layered perovskite ruthenate Sr2RuO4 in a parallel magnetic field
similarity 0.94Naoki Kikugawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Gap Structure of Spin-Triplet Superconductor Sr2RuO4 Studied by Thermal Conductivity
similarity 0.93K. Izawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structure and microstructure of the ferromagnetic superconductor RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.93A. C. McLaughlin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local magnetic response of superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin films
similarity 0.93G. M. Ferguson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified