← Back to search

Superconducting subphase in the layered perovskite ruthenate Sr2RuO4 in a parallel magnetic field

Naoki Kikugawa, Taichi Terashima, Shinya Uji, Kaori Sugii, Yoshiteru Maeno, David Graf, Ryan Baumbach, James Brooks

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.184513 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Magnetic torque measurements using a microcantilever have been performed to investigate the superconducting phase of Sr2RuO4 down to 40 mK. For high-quality single crystals with the transition temperature (Tc) of 1.48–1.49 K, an abrupt jump of the torque signal is found near 1.5 T in field parallel to the conducting RuO2 planes below ∼0.8K. The jump corresponds to the first order transition recently revealed by magnetocaloric and magnetization measurements [Yonezawa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 077003 (2013); Kittaka et al., Phys. Rev. B 90, 220502(R) (2014)]. Furthermore, weak diamagnetic and irreversible signals are found to persist above the first order transition up to 1.85 T. The result indicates the presence of a subphase boundary separating low- and high-field phases in the superconducting phase. The high-field subphase disappears when the field is tilted from the conducting planes only by a few degrees. Quantum oscillation measurements are also reported to clarify the strong sample-quality dependence of the high-field subphase.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.49Pressure not reportedonset
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.48Pressure not reportedonset
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.44Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers