Characteristics of superconducting tungsten silicide WxSi1−x for single photon detection
X. Zhang, A. Engel, Q. Wang, A. Schilling, A. Semenov, M. Sidorova, H.-W. Hübers, I. Charaev, K. Ilin, M. Siegel
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.174509 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting properties of three series of amorphous WxSi1−x films with different thickness and stoichiometry were investigated by dc transport measurements in a magnetic field up to 9 T. These amorphous WxSi1−x films were deposited by magnetron cosputtering of the elemental source targets onto silicon substrates at room temperature and patterned in the form of bridges by optical lithography and reactive ion etching. Analysis of the data on magnetoconductivity allowed us to extract the critical temperatures, superconducting coherence lengths, magnetic penetration depths, and diffusion constants of electrons in the normal state as functions of film thickness for each stoichiometry. Two basic time constants were derived from transport and time-resolving measurements. A dynamic process of the formation of a hotspot was analyzed in the framework of a diffusion-based vortex-entry model. We used a two-stage diffusion approach and defined a hotspot size by assuming that the quasiparticles and normal-state electrons have the same diffusion constant. With this definition and these measured material parameters, the hotspot in the 5-nm-thick W0.85Si0.15 film had a diameter of 107 nm at the peak of the number of nonequilibrium quasiparticles.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| W0.75Si0.25 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.86 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| W0.75Si0.25 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.88 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| W0.8Si0.2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.02 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| W0.8Si0.2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.08 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| W0.85Si0.15 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.83 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| W0.85Si0.15 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.85 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
Similar papers
Characteristics of superconducting tungsten silicide WxSi1-x for single photon detection
similarity 0.99X. Zhang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.07854
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal-property optimization dominated by the stoichiometric ratio in W-Si superconducting single-photon detectors
similarity 0.94Zhi Qin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determining the depairing current in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
similarity 0.93S. Frasca et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sequential superconductor–Bose insulator–Fermi insulator phase transitions in quasi-two-dimensional α-WSi
similarity 0.93Xiaofu Zhang & Andreas Schilling
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong suppression of the resistivity near the superconducting transition in narrow microbridges in external magnetic fields
similarity 0.92Xiaofu Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting fluctuations and characteristic time scales in amorphous WSi
similarity 0.92Xiaofu Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified