Asymmetric nanowire SQUID: Linear current-phase relation, stochastic switching, and symmetries
A. Murphy, A. Bezryadin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094507 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study nanostructures based on two ultrathin superconducting nanowires connected in parallel to form a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The measured function of the critical current versus magnetic field, IC(B), is multivalued, asymmetric, and its maxima and minima are shifted from the usual integer and half integer flux quantum points. We also propose a low-temperature-limit model which generates accurate fits to the IC(B) functions and provides verifiable predictions. The key assumption of our model is that each wire is characterized by a sample-specific critical phase ϕC defined as the phase difference at which the supercurrent in the wire is the maximum. For our nanowires ϕC is much greater than the usual π/2, which makes a qualitative difference in the behavior of the SQUID. The nanowire current-phase relation is assumed linear, since the wires are much longer than the coherence length. The model explains single-valuedness regions where only one vorticity value nv is stable. Also, it predicts regions where multiple vorticity values are stable because the Little-Parks (LP) diamonds, which describe the region of stability for each winding number nv in the current-field diagram, can overlap. We also observe and explain regions in which the standard deviation of the switching current is independent of the magnetic field. We develop a technique that allows a reliable detection of hidden phase slips and use it to determine the boundaries of the LP diamonds even at low currents where IC(B) is not directly measurable.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo75Ge25 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Asymmetric nanowire SQUID: linear CPR, stochastic switching, and symmetries
similarity 0.91Andrew Murphy & Alexey Bezryadin · 2016 · arXiv:1609.03877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of High Magnetic Fields on the Superconducting Transition of One-Dimensional Nb and MoGe Nanowires
similarity 0.89A. Rogachev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanoscale superconducting memory based on the kinetic inductance of asymmetric nanowire loops
similarity 0.88Andrew Murphy et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1701.08715
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Formation of Quantum Phase Slip Pairs in Superconducting Nanowires
similarity 0.88Andrey Belkin et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.5128
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent flow in inhomogeneous superconductors
similarity 0.87Mikhail A. Skvortsov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multi-terminal multi-junction dc SQUID for nanoscale magnetometry
similarity 0.87Alexander Y. Meltzer et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.05682
Source status unknown — claims are unverified