Asymmetric nanowire SQUID: linear CPR, stochastic switching, and symmetries
Andrew Murphy, Alexey Bezryadin
arXiv:1609.03877 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094507 · 2016-09-13 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study nanodevices based on ultrathin superconducting nanowires connected in parallel to form nanowire SQUIDs. The function of the critical current versus magnetic field, $I_{C}(B)$, is multivalued, asymmetric and its maxima and minima are shifted from the usual integer and half integer flux quantum points. The nanowire interference device is qualitatively distinct from conventional SQUIDs because nanowires do not obey the same current-phase relationship (CPR) as Josephson junctions. We demonstrate that the results can be explained assuming that (i) the CPR is linear and (ii) that each wire is characterized by a sample-specific critical phase, which is usually much larger than $π/2$. Our proposed model offers accurate fits to $I_{C}(B)$. It explains the single-valuedness regions where only one vorticity (i.e., the order parameter winding number) is stable as well as regions where multiple vorticity values are allowed for the SQUIDs. We also observe and explain regions in which the standard deviation of the switching current is independent of the magnetic field. We develop a technique that allows a reliable detection of hidden phase-slips. Using this technique we find that our model correctly predicts the boundaries of vorticity regions, even at low currents where $I_C(B)$ is not directly measurable.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo25Ge75 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Asymmetric nanowire SQUID: Linear current-phase relation, stochastic switching, and symmetries
similarity 0.92A. Murphy & A. Bezryadin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetry of the critical current function in superconducting nanodevices
similarity 0.89Ziqi Zhao et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.14051
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced superconducting circuits and devices
similarity 0.88Martin Weides & Hannes Rotzinger · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metastable states and hidden phase slips in nanobridge SQUIDs
similarity 0.87Lukas Nulens et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.13927
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Insulator nano-SQUID: Flux-tunable platform for topological superconductivity
similarity 0.87Ella Nikodem et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.07993
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Asymmetric higher-harmonic SQUID as a Josephson diode
similarity 0.87Ya. V. Fominov & D. S. Mikhailov · 2022 · arXiv:2208.10856
Source status unknown — claims are unverified