Direct evidence of superconductivity and determination of the superfluid density in buried ultrathin FeSe grown on SrTiO3
P. K. Biswas, Z. Salman, Q. Song, R. Peng, J. Zhang, L. Shu, D. L. Feng, T. Prokscha, E. Morenzoni
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.174509 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Bulk FeSe is superconducting with a critical temperature Tc≅8 K and SrTiO3 is insulating in nature, yet high-temperature superconductivity has been reported at the interface between a single-layer FeSe and SrTiO3. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy measurements observe a gap opening at the Fermi surface below ≈60 K. Elucidating the microscopic properties and understanding the pairing mechanism of single-layer FeSe is of utmost importance as it is a basic building block of iron-based superconductors. Here, we use the low-energy muon spin rotation/relaxation technique to detect and quantify the supercarrier density and determine the gap symmetry in FeSe grown on SrTiO3 (100). Measurements in applied field show a temperature-dependent broadening of the field distribution below ∼60 K, reflecting the superconducting transition and formation of a vortex state. Zero-field measurements rule out the presence of magnetism of static or fluctuating origin. From the inhomogeneous field distribution, we determine an effective sheet supercarrier density ns2D≃6×1014cm−2 at T→0 K, which is a factor of 4 larger than expected from ARPES measurements of the excess electron count per Fe of 1 monolayer FeSe. The temperature dependence of the superfluid density ns(T) can be well described down to ∼10 K by simple s-wave BCS, indicating a rather clean superconducting phase with a gap of 10.2(1.1) meV. The result is a clear indication of the gradual formation of a two-dimensional vortex lattice existing over the entire large FeSe/STO interface and provides unambiguous evidence for robust superconductivity below 60 K in ultrathin FeSe.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 60 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 65 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Understanding and enhancing superconductivity in FeSe/SrTiO3 by quantum size effects
similarity 0.98Bruno Murta & Antonio M. García-García
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting dome revealed by surface structure dependence in single unit cell FeSe on SrTiO3(001)
similarity 0.97Tomoaki Tanaka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Superconducting State in FeSe/SrTiO3 by a Dynamic Interfacial Polaron Mechanism
similarity 0.97Shuyuan Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-temperature superconductivity at the FeSe/SrTiO3 interface
similarity 0.97Yuan-Yuan Xiang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of single unit cell FeSe/SrTiO3(001): Substrate-surface superstructure dependence
similarity 0.97Tomoaki Tanaka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron Vacancy Tunable Superconductor-Insulator Transition in FeSe/SrTiO3 Monolayer
similarity 0.97Cheng-Long Xue et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified