← Back to search

Universal phase diagram of superconductivity and charge density wave versus high hydrostatic pressure in pure and Se-doped 1T−TaS2

Bosen Wang, Yu Liu, Xuan Luo, Kento Ishigaki, Kazuyuki Matsubayashi, Wenjian Lu, Yuping Sun, Jinguang Cheng, Yoshiya Uwatoko

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.220504 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The coexistence of superconductivity (SC) and charge density waves (CDWs) was investigated for pure and Se-doped 1T−TaS2 via electrical resistivity under hydrostatic pressure. A universal superconducting phase diagram was revealed on the border of CDWs. Unlike isovalent S/Se doping and uniaxial pressure, the application of high hydrostatic pressure suppresses CDW more sensitively and thoroughly with the critical pressures Pc(x)∼4.70–6.55 GPa. A pressure-induced superconducting state coexists with various CDWs, then bulk SC emerges along with the complete collapse of various CDWs. The superconducting transition temperature increases monotonously up to ∼7.3K at 15 GPa without a domelike shape. The results clarify that the superconducting Cooper pairing is associated with the CDWs’ instability near Pc(x). Above Pc(x), the monotonous increase of Tc is attributed to different evolutions of the electronic structures and phonon vibration spectra under hydrostatic and uniaxial pressures and a further inhibition of undetected CDWs.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
TaS2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.315 GPaonset
TaS2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.715 GPazero_resistance
TaS2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.41.5 GPaonset
TaS2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.95 GPazero_resistance
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.815 GPaonset
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.615 GPazero_resistance
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.915 GPaonset
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.915 GPazero_resistance
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.315 GPaonset
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.615 GPazero_resistance
TaS1-xSex

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.6Pressure unresolvedunknown
TiSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.8Pressure not reportedunknown
CuxTiSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.2Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers