Spin-split conductance and subgap peak in ferromagnet/superconductor spin valve heterostructures
Evan Moen, Oriol T. Valls
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.104512 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider the separate spin channel contributions to the charge conductance in superconducting/ferromagnetic spin valve F1/N/F2/S structures. We find that the up- and down-spin conductance contributions may have a very different behavior in the subgap bias region (i.e., there is a spin-split conductance). This leads to a subgap peak in the total conductance. This peak behavior, which can be prominent also in N/F/S systems, is strongly dependent, in a periodic way, on the thickness of the intermediate ferromagnetic layer. We study this phenomenon for the ballistic scattering regime using a numerical self consistent method, with additional insights gained from an approximate analytic calculation for an infinite N/F/S structure. We study also the angular dependence on the relative magnetization angle between F1 and F2 of both the spin-split and the total conductance. We do so for realistic material parameters, layer thicknesses, and interface quality values relevant to previous [Jara et al., Phys. Rev. B 89, 184502 (2014)] experimental studies on such devices. We also find that the spin-split conductance is highly dependent on the interfacial scattering in these devices, and we carefully include these effects for realistic systems. A strong valve effect is found for the angularly dependent subgap peak conductance that is largely independent on the scattering and may prove useful in actual realizations of a superconducting spin valve device.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Spin-split conductance and subgap peak in ferromagnet/superconductor spin valve heterostructures
similarity 0.93Evan Moen & Oriol T. Valls · 2018 · arXiv:1807.09206
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport in ferromagnet/superconductor spin valves
similarity 0.93Evan Moen & Oriol T. Valls
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic exchange coupling through superconductors: A trilayer study
similarity 0.92C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hysteretic magnetic pinning and reversible resistance switching in high-temperature superconductor/ferromagnet multilayers
similarity 0.92C. Visani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Putting unwanted surface states to good use: Large modulation of the superconducting state in a degenerate semiconductor by a gate
similarity 0.91Bikash C. Barik et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Density of states of disordered topological superconductor-semiconductor hybrid nanowires
similarity 0.91Jay D. Sau & S. Das Sarma
Source status unknown — claims are unverified