Diamagnetic response of a superconducting surface superstructure: Si(111)-√7×√3-In
Yanfu Wu, Ming-Chao Duan, Ningning Liu, Gang Yao, Dandan Guan, Shiyong Wang, Yao-Yi Li, Hao Zheng, Canhua Liu, Jin-Feng Jia
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.140506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Macroscopic superconductivity in various ultrathin films at the ultimate two-dimensional limit, i.e., films with thickness of only one- or two-atomic layers supported by single-crystal surfaces, has manifested itself in experiments with only zero resistance but not yet with the Meissner effect due to the lack of a proper in situ technique, although both phenomena are the defining characteristics of a superconductor. Using a self-developed multifunctional scanning tunneling microscope, we succeeded in detecting not only the macroscopic supercurrent but also diamagnetic response of a two-atomic-layer indium film on a Si(111) surface. The diamagnetic measurements reveal that the low-temperature variation of penetration depth follows the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory in the dirty limit. The magnitude of the pair-breaking interaction is determined to be 0.80 from the magnetic field dependence of the zero-temperature penetration depth, which implies that the pairing symmetry deviates slightly from an isotropic s wave. The present work demonstrates that it is possible to observe the Meissner effect in ultrathin superconducting films that are vulnerable to air, which is very helpful for a detailed understanding of the microscopic pairing mechanism.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Si(111)-√7×√3-In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Si(111)-√7×√3-In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.1 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Si(111)-√7×√3-Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Unconventional superconductivity in the single-atom-layer alloy Si(111)−√3×√3−(Tl,Pb)
similarity 0.93T. Nakamura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chiral d-wave superconductivity in a triangular surface lattice mediated by long-range interaction
similarity 0.90Xiaodong Cao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron localization effects on the low-temperature high-field magnetoresistivity of three-dimensional amorphous superconductors
similarity 0.89A. V. Samoilov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure-induced superconductivity in high-pressure phases of Si
similarity 0.89T. H. Lin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional superconductivity and paramagnetic Meissner response triggered by nonlocal pairing interaction in proximitized heterostructures
similarity 0.88A. A. Kopasov & A. S. Mel'nikov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Meissner Effect in a Normal-Metal–Superconductor Junction with a Spin-Active Interface
similarity 0.88Takehito Yokoyama et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified