Transition temperature to the superconducting phase of QCD at high baryon density
William E. Brown, James T. Liu, Hai-cang Ren
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.054016 · Physical Review D
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent interest in the study of color superconductivity has focused on the regime of high baryon density where perturbative QCD may be employed. Based on the dominant one-gluon-exchange interaction, both the transition temperature and zero temperature gap have been determined to leading order in the coupling g. While the leading non-BCS behavior TC∼μg−5e−κ/g is easily obtained, the pre-exponential factor has proved more difficult to evaluate. Focusing on the transition temperature, we present a perturbative derivation of this factor, exact to leading order in g. This approach is first motivated by the study of a toy model and involves working to second order in the perturbative expansion. We compare this result to the zero temperature gap. Additionally, we extend the analysis to the case of higher angular momentum for longitudinal and transverse quark pairing.
Similar papers
The Transition Temperature to the Superconducting Phase of QCD at High Baryon Density
similarity 0.93William E. Brown et al. · 1999 · arXiv:hep-ph/9912409
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
How the quark self-energy affects the color-superconducting gap
similarity 0.93Qun Wang & Dirk H. Rischke
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Color Superconductivity of QCD at High Baryon Density
similarity 0.90Hai-cang Ren · 2004 · arXiv:hep-ph/0404074
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Fluctuations in Strongly Coupled d-Wave Superconductors
similarity 0.89Matthias Mayr et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Energy gap and critical temperature in a resonating-valence-bond theory of high-Tc superconductivity
similarity 0.89Michael Nauenberg
Source status unknown — claims are unverified