Transition from Sign-Reversed to Sign-Preserved Cooper-Pairing Symmetry in Sulfur-Doped Iron Selenide Superconductors
Qisi Wang, J. T. Park, Yu Feng, Yao Shen, Yiqing Hao, Bingying Pan, J. W. Lynn, A. Ivanov, Songxue Chi, M. Matsuda, Huibo Cao, R. J. Birgeneau, D. V. Efremov, Jun Zhao
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.197004 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An essential step toward elucidating the mechanism of superconductivity is to determine the sign or phase of the superconducting order parameter, as it is closely related to the pairing interaction. In conventional superconductors, the electron-phonon interaction induces attraction between electrons near the Fermi energy and results in a sign-preserved s-wave pairing. For high-temperature superconductors, including cuprates and iron-based superconductors, prevalent weak coupling theories suggest that the electron pairing is mediated by spin fluctuations which lead to repulsive interactions, and therefore that a sign-reversed pairing with an s± or d-wave symmetry is favored. Here, by using magnetic neutron scattering, a phase sensitive probe of the superconducting gap, we report the observation of a transition from the sign-reversed to sign-preserved Cooper-pairing symmetry with insignificant changes in Tc in the S-doped iron selenide superconductors KxFe2−y(Se1−zSz)2. We show that a rather sharp magnetic resonant mode well below the superconducting gap (2Δ) in the undoped sample (z=0) is replaced by a broad hump structure above 2Δ under 50% S doping. These results cannot be readily explained by simple spin fluctuation-exchange pairing theories and, therefore, multiple pairing channels are required to describe superconductivity in this system. Our findings may also yield a simple explanation for the sometimes contradictory data on the sign of the superconducting order parameter in iron-based materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| KxFe2-y(Se1-zSz)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KxFe2-y(Se1-zSz)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KxFe2-y(Se1-zSz)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KxFe2-y(Se1-zSz)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of doping on electrical, magnetic, and superconducting properties of KxFe2−yS2
similarity 0.93Jiangang Guo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Testing the sign-changing superconducting gap in iron-based superconductors with quasiparticle interference and neutron scattering
similarity 0.93Tanmoy Das & A. V. Balatsky · 2011 · arXiv:1110.3834
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and magnetic properties of single crystals of K0.75Fe1.66Se2 and Cs0.81Fe1.61Se2
similarity 0.92J. J. Ying et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity at 32 K in single-crystalline RbxFe2−ySe2
similarity 0.92A. F. Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting phase in KxFe2−ySe2: Critical role of intact FeSe layers
similarity 0.92Shaoshuai Hou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Different response of superconductivity to the transition-metal impurities in K0.8Fe2−y−xMxSe2 (M = Cr, Mn, Co, Zn)
similarity 0.92Dian Tan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified