← Back to search

Electron Number-Based Phase Diagram of Pr1−xLaCexCuO4−δ and Possible Absence of Disparity between Electron- and Hole-Doped Cuprate Phase Diagrams

Dongjoon Song, Garam Han, Wonshik Kyung, Jeongjin Seo, Soohyun Cho, Beom Seo Kim, Masashi Arita, Kenya Shimada, Hirofumi Namatame, Masaki Taniguchi, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, Seung Ryong Park, C. Kim

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.137001 · Physical Review Letters

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We performed annealing and angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy studies on electron-doped cuprate Pr1−xLaCexCuO4−δ (PLCCO). It is found that the optimal annealing condition is dependent on the Ce content x. The electron number (n) is estimated from the experimentally obtained Fermi surface volume for x=0.10, 0.15 and 0.18 samples. It clearly shows a significant and annealing dependent deviation from the nominal x. In addition, we observe that the pseudo-gap at hot spots is also closely correlated with n; the pseudogap gradually closes as n increases. We established a new phase diagram of PLCCO as a function of n. Different from the x-based one, the new phase diagram shows similar antiferromagnetic and superconducting phases to those of hole doped ones. Our results raise a possibility for absence of disparity between the phase diagrams of electron- and hole-doped cuprates

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Pr1-xLaCexCuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers