Comment on “ T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors at Low Temperatures: Can It Be Linear?”
G. E. Volovik
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4023 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by N. Schopohl and O. V. Dolgov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4761 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Similar papers
Comment on “ T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors at Low Temperatures: Can It Be Linear?”
similarity 1.00P. J. Hirschfeld et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Critical Fluctuations in Superconductors and the Magnetic Field Penetration Depth”
similarity 0.87Ian D. Lawrie
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘‘Zeeman effect on magnetoresistance in high-temperature superconductors’’
similarity 0.86R. S. Thompson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Spin Dynamics of the Electron-Doped High-Tc Superconducting Cuprates”
similarity 0.83Thomas Dahm & Ilya Eremin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-pinning energies in high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.83E. Zeldov & N. M. Amer
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Nonmonotonic dx2−y2 Superconducting Order Parameter in Nd2−xCexCuO4”
similarity 0.83F. Venturini et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified