Comment on “Is the Nonlinear Meissner Effect Unobservable?”
Anand Bhattacharya, Igor Z̆utić, Oriol T. Valls, A. M. Goldman
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.887 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by M.-R. Li, P. J. Hirschfeld, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5640 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6.95 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Is the Nonlinear Meissner Effect Unobservable?
similarity 0.94M.-R. Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ``Paramagnetic Meissner effect in Nb''
similarity 0.93T. M. Rice & M. Sigrist
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reanalysis of the magnetic field dependence of the penetration depth: Observation of the nonlinear Meissner effect
similarity 0.93Klaus Halterman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of nonlinear Meissner effect in YBa2Cu3O6.95
similarity 0.93A. Carrington et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear Meissner effect in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.93D. Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong Surface Contribution to the Nonlinear Meissner Effect in d-Wave Superconductors
similarity 0.92A. Zare et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified