Superconductivity in Bi/Ni bilayer system: Clear role of superconducting phases found at Bi/Ni interface
L. Y. Liu, Y. T. Xing, I. L. C. Merino, H. Micklitz, D. F. Franceschini, E. Baggio-Saitovitch, D. C. Bell, I. G. Solórzano
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.014601 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Bi/Ni bilayers with varying Bi and Ni layer thicknesses have been prepared by (a) pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) at 300 K and (b) thermal evaporation at 4.2 K. A two-step superconducting transition appears on the electrical transport measurements in the samples prepared by PLD. High-resolution transmission and scanning transmission electron microscopy, supported by energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) analysis, reveal that two superconducting intermetallic alloys, namely NiBi and NiBi3, are formed by interdiffusion, if the bilayers are prepared at 300 K. The Tc of the two phases behaves very differently in an external magnetic field and the upper critical magnetic fields at zero temperature [Bc2(0)] were estimated as 1.1 and 7.4 T, respectively. The lower value corresponds to the Bc2(0) of NiBi3 phase and the higher one is supposed to be of NiBi. These alloys are responsible for the superconductivity and the two-step transition appearing in the Bi/Ni bilayer system. Surprisingly, the Bi-rich phase (NiBi3) is formed near the Ni layer, while the Ni-rich phase (NiBi) is formed far from the Ni layer. The EDXS analysis at nanometer scale clearly shows an unusual increase of Ni concentration near the interface of Bi/substrate. The limited thickness of Bi layer in the interdiffusion process results in an unexpected distribution of Ni concentration. Samples prepared at 4.2 K after annealing at 300 K do not show any superconductivity, which indicates that a nonepitaxial Bi/Ni interface does not induce superconductivity in the case interdiffusion does not occur. These results offer a deeper understanding of the superconductivity in the Bi/Ni bilayer system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiBi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NiBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity and Magnetism in Bi-Ni System: From Bulk to Heterostructures
similarity 0.91Gabriel Sant'Ana et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2608.28855
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the Origin of Superconductivity at Nickel-Bismuth Interfaces
similarity 0.91Matthew Vaughan et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.10427
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the Bi/Ni bilayer
similarity 0.91Sung-Po Chao · 2018 · arXiv:1808.05333
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and magnetism on flux-grown single crystals of NiBi3
similarity 0.91B. Silva et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Linear magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall effect in the superconductor NiBi3
similarity 0.90Gabriel Sant'ana et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a Bi/Ni bilayer
similarity 0.90Sung-Po Chao
Source status unknown — claims are unverified