Enhanced spin polarization of amorphous FexSi1−x thin films revealed by Andreev reflection spectroscopy
J. Karel, D. S. Bouma, J. Martinez, Y. N. Zhang, J. A. Gifford, J. Zhang, G. J. Zhao, D. R. Kim, B. C. Li, Z. Y. Huang, R. Q. Wu, T. Y. Chen, F. Hellman
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.064411 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Point contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy has been utilized to determine the spin polarization of both amorphous and crystalline FexSi1−x (0.58<x<0.68) thin films. The amorphous materials exhibited a substantial spin polarization (generally greater than 60%), despite significant changes in magnetization and resistivity. In particular, the polarization value in the x=0.65 amorphous alloy is about 70%, significantly higher than most ferromagnets, including numerous Heusler compounds that are theoretically predicted to be half-metallic ferromagnets. The composition dependence of the spin polarization in the amorphous materials is proportional to (but substantially larger than) the DFT-calculated values. The polarization of a crystalline thin film with x=0.65, by contrast, is only 49%, similar to that of common magnetic metals. The enhanced spin polarization in the amorphous structure is attributed to the modification of the local environments. This work demonstrates that the spin polarization, as well as magnetic moment, anomalous Hall effect, and electrical resistivity, can be tuned by introducing structural disorder as an engineering tool.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic-flux quanta in superconducting thin films observed by electron holography and digital phase analysis
similarity 0.89Shuji Hasegawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting nanofilms: Andreev-type states induced by quantum confinement
similarity 0.89A. A. Shanenko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity-enhanced spin pumping: Role of Andreev resonances
similarity 0.89Mostafa Tanhayi Ahari & Yaroslav Tserkovnyak
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave spectroscopy of interacting Andreev spins
similarity 0.89J. J. Wesdorp et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Light-modulated Andreev effects in graphene-based superconducting junctions
similarity 0.89Miao Yu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-field induced quantum-size cascades in superconducting nanowires
similarity 0.89A. A. Shanenko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified