← Back to search

Observability of superconductivity in Sr-doped Bi2Se3 at the surface using scanning tunneling microscope

Mahasweta Bagchi, Jens Brede, Yoichi Ando

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.034201 · Physical Review Materials

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The superconducting materials family of doped Bi2Se3 remains intensively studied in the field of condensed matter physics due to strong experimental evidence for topologically nontrivial superconductivity in the bulk. However, at the surface of these materials, even the observation of superconductivity itself is still controversial. We use scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) down to 0.4 K to show that on the surface of bulk superconducting SrxBi2Se3, no gap in the density of states is observed around the Fermi energy as long as clean metallic probe tips are used. Nevertheless, using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, we find that micrometer-sized flakes of SrxBi2Se3 are easily transferred from the sample onto the STM probe tip and that such flakes consistently show a superconducting gap in the density of states. We argue that the superconductivity in SrxBi2Se3 crystals does not extend to the surface when the topological surface state (TSS) is intact, but in microflakes, the TSS has been destroyed due to strain and allows the superconductivity to extend to the surface. To understand this phenomenon, we propose that the local electric field, always found in electron-doped Bi2Se3 in the presence of the TSS due to an intrinsic upward band bending, works against superconductivity at the surface.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.9Pressure not reportedonset
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.65Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.8Pressure not reportedmidpoint
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.4Pressure not reportedunknown
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3Pressure not reportedunknown
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5Pressure not reportedunknown
SrxBi2Se3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.9Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers