Charge ordering as the driving mechanism for superconductivity in rare-earth nickel oxides
Álvaro Adrián Carrasco Álvarez, Lucia Iglesias, Sébastien Petit, Wilfrid Prellier, Manuel Bibes, Julien Varignon
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.064801 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity is one of the most intriguing properties of matter, described by an attractive interaction that binds electrons into Cooper pairs. To date, the highest critical temperature at ambient conditions is achieved in copper oxides. While layered nickel oxides were long proposed to be analogous to cuprates, superconductivity was only demonstrated in 2019 albeit without clarifying the pairing mechanism. Here we use density functional theory to show that superconductivity in nickelates is driven by an electron-phonon coupling originating from a charge ordering. Due to an intrinsic electronic instability in half-doped compounds, Ni1.5+ cations dismutate into more stable Ni+ and Ni2+ cations, which is accompanied by a bond disproportionation of NiO4 complexes producing an insulating charge-ordered state. Once doping suppresses the instability, the bond disproportionation vibration is sufficient to reproduce the key characteristic of nickelates observed experimentally, notably the dome of Tc as a function of doping content. These phenomena are identified if relevant degrees of freedom as well as an exchange-correlation functional that sufficiently amends self-interaction errors are involved in the simulations. Finally, despite the presence of correlation effects inherent to 3d elements that favor the formation of local Ni spins, the mechanism behind the formation of Cooper pairs in nickelate superconductors appears similar to that of nonmagnetic bismuth oxide superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1-xSrxNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Charge ordering as the driving mechanism for superconductivity in rare-earth nickel oxides
similarity 1.00Álvaro Adrián Carrasco Álvarez et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.04870
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity, Josephson Coupling, and Order Parameter Symmetry in Striped Cuprates
similarity 0.95A. H. Castro Neto & F. Guinea
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-gap proximity effect mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.93V. J. Emery et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital Engineering in Nickelate Heterostructures Driven by Anisotropic Oxygen Hybridization rather than Orbital Energy Levels
similarity 0.93G. Fabbris et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Upper critical field for underdoped high-Tc superconductors: Pseudogap and stripe phase
similarity 0.93Marcin Mierzejewski & Maciej M. Maśka
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge order and superconductivity in a two-band model for infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.92Cheng Peng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified