Superconducting phase diagram in BixNi1–x thin films: The effects of Bi stoichiometry on superconductivity
Jihun Park, Jarryd A. Horn, Dylan J. Kirsch, Rohit K. Pant, Hyeok Yoon, Sungha Baek, Suchismita Sarker, Apurva Mehta, Xiaohang Zhang, Seunghun Lee, Richard Greene, Johnpierre Paglione, Ichiro Takeuchi
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.074805 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Bi-Ni binary system has been of interest due to possible unconventional superconductivity aroused therein, such as time-reversal symmetry breaking in Bi/Ni bilayers or the coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in Bi3Ni crystals. While Ni acts as a ferromagnetic element in such systems, the role of the strong spin-orbit coupling element Bi in superconductivity has remained unexplored. In this work, we systematically studied the effects of Bi stoichiometry on the superconductivity of BixNi1–x thin films (x≈0.5–0.9) fabricated via a composition-spread approach. The superconducting phase map of BixNi1–x thin films exhibited a superconducting composition region attributable to the intermetallic Bi3Ni phase with different amounts of excess Bi, revealed by synchrotron x-ray diffraction analysis. Interestingly, the mixed-phase region with Bi3Ni and Bi showed unusual increases in the superconducting transition temperature and residual resistance ratio as more Bi impurities were included, with the maximum Tc (=4.2K) observed at x≈0.79. A correlation analysis of structural, electrical, and magneto-transport characteristics across the composition variation revealed that the unusual superconducting “dome” is due to two competing roles of Bi: impurity scattering and carrier doping. We found that the carrier doping effect is dominant in the mild doping regime (0.74≤x≤0.79), while impurity scattering becomes more pronounced at larger Bi stoichiometry.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi3Ni Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.2 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| BiNi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi3Ni Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting phase diagram in BiNi thin films the effects of Bi stoichiometry on superconductivity
similarity 0.99Jihun Park et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.18704
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of binary and ternary compounds of Bi
similarity 0.94B. Jayaram et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of cluster size on the normal- and superconducting-state properties of granular Bi films
similarity 0.94C. Vossloh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity in Ni/Bi Bilayers
similarity 0.93P. LeClair et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting phases of Bi and Ga induced by deposition on a Ni sublayer
similarity 0.93J. S. Moodera & R. Meservey
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Origin of superconductivity at nickel-bismuth interfaces
similarity 0.93Matthew Vaughan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified