← Back to search

Fate of the Hebel-Slichter peak in superconductors with strong antiferromagnetic fluctuations

D. C. Cavanagh, B. J. Powell

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013241 · Physical Review Research

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We show that magnetic fluctuations can destroy the Hebel-Slichter peak in conventional superconductors. The Hebel-Slichter peak has previously been expected to survive even in the presence of strong electronic interactions. However, we show that antiferromagnetic fluctuations suppress the peak at q=0 in the imaginary part of the magnetic susceptibility χ+−″q,ω, which causes the Hebel-Slichter peak. This is of general interest as in many materials superconductivity is found near a magnetically ordered phase, and the absence of a Hebel-Slichter peak is taken as evidence of unconventional superconductivity in these systems. For example, no Hebel-Slichter peak is observed in the κ−(BEDT−TTF)2X organic superconductors but heat capacity measurements have been taken to indicate s-wave superconductivity. Similarly, experiments indicate nodeless superconductivity in many iron pnictide superconductors which exhibit no peak in the relaxation rate. If antiferromagnetic fluctuations destroy the putative Hebel-Slichter peak in organic superconductors, then the peak should be restored by applying a pressure, which is known to suppress antiferromagnetic correlations in these materials.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers