Mitigating crosstalk errors by randomized compiling: Simulation of the BCS model on a superconducting quantum computer
Hugo Perrin, Thibault Scoquart, Alexander Shnirman, Jörg Schmalian, Kyrylo Snizhko
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013142 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We develop and apply an extension of the randomized compiling (RC) protocol that includes a special treatment of neighboring qubits and dramatically reduces crosstalk effects caused by the application of faulty gates on superconducting qubits in IBMQ quantum computers (ibm_lagos and ibmq_ehningen). Crosstalk errors, stemming from controlled-not (cnot) two-qubit gates, are a crucial source of errors on numerous quantum computing platforms. For the IBMQ machines, their effect on the performance of a given quantum computation is often overlooked. Our RC protocol turns coherent noise due to crosstalk into a depolarizing noise channel that can then be treated using established error mitigation schemes, such as noise estimation circuits. We apply our approach to the quantum simulation of the nonequilibrium dynamics of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) Hamiltonian for superconductivity, a particularly challenging model to simulate on quantum hardware because of the long-range interaction of Cooper pairs. With 135 cnot gates, we work in a regime where crosstalk, as opposed to either Trotterization or qubit decoherence, dominates the error. Our twirling of neighboring qubits is shown to dramatically improve the noise estimation protocol without the need to add new qubits or circuits and allows for a quantitative simulation of the BCS model.
Similar papers
Mitigating crosstalk errors by randomized compiling: Simulation of the BCS model on a superconducting quantum computer
similarity 0.88Hugo Perrin et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.02345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optimal quantum control using randomized benchmarking
similarity 0.86J. Kelly et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.0035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform
similarity 0.86M. Ganzhorn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface code with decoherence: An analysis of three superconducting architectures
similarity 0.85Joydip Ghosh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit
similarity 0.84J. Kelly et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1411.7403
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Fidelity, High-Scalability Two-Qubit Gate Scheme for Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.84Yuan Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified