Disentangling Losses in Tantalum Superconducting Circuits
Kevin D. Crowley, Russell A. McLellan, Aveek Dutta, Nana Shumiya, Alexander P. M. Place, Xuan Hoang Le, Youqi Gang, Trisha Madhavan, Matthew P. Bland, Ray Chang, Nishaad Khedkar, Yiming Cady Feng, Esha A. Umbarkar, Xin Gui, Lila V. H. Rodgers, Yichen Jia, Mayer M. Feldman, Stephen A. Lyon, Mingzhao Liu, Robert J. Cava, Andrew A. Houck, Nathalie P. de Leon
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041005 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting qubits are a leading system for realizing large-scale quantum processors, but overall gate fidelities suffer from coherence times limited by microwave dielectric loss. Recently discovered tantalum-based qubits exhibit record lifetimes exceeding 0.3 ms. Here, we perform systematic, detailed measurements of superconducting tantalum resonators in order to disentangle sources of loss that limit state-of-the-art tantalum devices. By studying the dependence of loss on temperature, microwave photon number, and device geometry, we quantify materials-related losses and observe that the losses are dominated by several types of saturable two-level systems (TLSs), with evidence that both surface and bulk related TLSs contribute to loss. Moreover, we show that surface TLSs can be altered with chemical processing. With four different surface conditions, we quantitatively extract the linear absorption associated with different surface TLS sources. Finally, we quantify the impact of the chemical processing at single-photon powers, the relevant conditions for qubit device performance. In this regime, we measure resonators with internal quality factors ranging from 5 to 15×106, comparable to the best qubits reported. In these devices, the surface and bulk TLS contributions to loss are comparable, showing that systematic improvements in materials on both fronts are necessary to improve qubit coherence further.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Lateral proximity effect and long-range energy-gap gradients in Ta/Al and Nb/Al superconducting tunnel junctions
similarity 0.92Roland den Hartog et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of magnetic field and Pincus states in normal-metal—superconductor tunnel junctions
similarity 0.91U. Gunsenheimer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle spectroscopy in tantalum films with different Ta/sapphire interfaces
similarity 0.91Bicky S. Moirangthem et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2603.06802
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localization and Mitigation of Loss in Niobium Superconducting Circuits
similarity 0.91M. Virginia P. Altoé et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determining interface dielectric losses in superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators
similarity 0.91Wayne Woods et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.10347
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Zero temperature superconductor–edge metal–insulator transition in two-dimensional bosonic systems
similarity 0.91Håvard H. Haugen & Asle Sudbø
Source status unknown — claims are unverified