Colloquium: Spin-orbit effects in superconducting hybrid structures
Morten Amundsen, Jacob Linder, Jason W. A. Robinson, Igor Žutić, Niladri Banerjee
DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.96.021003 · Reviews of Modern Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Spin-orbit coupling (SOC) relates to the interaction between an electron’s motion and its spin and is ubiquitous in solid-state systems. Although the effect of SOC in normal-state phenomena has been extensively studied, its role in superconducting hybrid structures and devices elicits many unexplored questions. In conjunction with broken symmetries and material inhomogeneities within superconducting hybrid structures, SOC may have contributions beyond its effects in homogeneous materials. Notably, even with well-established magnetic or nonmagnetic materials and conventional s-wave spin-singlet superconductors, SOC leads to emergent phenomena including equal-spin-triplet pairing and topological superconductivity (hosting Majorana states), a modified current-phase relationship in Josephson junctions, and nonreciprocal transport, including superconducting diode effects. SOC is also responsible for transforming quasiparticles in superconducting structures, which enhances the spin Hall effect and changes the spin dynamics. Taken together, SOC in superconducting hybrid structures and the potential for electric tuning of the SOC strength create interesting possibilities to advance superconducting spintronic devices for energy-efficient computing and enable topological fault-tolerant quantum computing. By providing a description of experimental techniques and theoretical methods to study SOC, this Colloquium describes the current understanding of resulting phenomena in superconducting structures and offers a framework to select and design a growing class of materials systems where SOC plays an important role.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Microscopic theory of spin transport at the interface between a superconductor and a ferromagnetic insulator
similarity 0.95T. Kato et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical Spin Polarization of Excess Quasiparticles in Superconductors
similarity 0.95Julia S. Meyer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear optical response in superconductors in magnetic field: Quantum geometry and topological superconductivity
similarity 0.95Hiroto Tanaka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of collective excitations in weakly coupled disordered superconductors
similarity 0.95Bo Fan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a mesoscopic superconducting system
similarity 0.95K. Wrześniewski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin transport and relaxation in superconductors
similarity 0.95T. Yamashita et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified