← Back to search

Parity Breaking and Sublattice Dichotomy in Monolayer FeSe Superconductor

Cui Ding, Zhipeng Xu, Xiaotong Jiao, Yinqi Hu, Wenxuan Zhao, Lexian Yang, Kun Jiang, Lili Wang, Jin-Feng Jia, Jiangping Hu, Qi-Kun Xue

DOI 10.1103/f3w1-rn6p · Physical Review Letters

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A unit cell represents the smallest repeating structure in solid-state physics and serves as the fundamental building block of a material. In iron-based superconductors, each unit cell contains two iron atoms, which form two sublattices in the two-dimensional iron layers. Under normal circumstances, these sublattices are expected to have identical physical properties due to space inversion symmetry. However, we discover that this sublattice structure can introduce a novel degree of freedom for probing unconventional pairing mechanisms in iron-based superconductors. We observe distinct dual tunneling spectra within the pairing gap energy corresponding to the two sublattices in the monolayer FeSe with atomically homogeneous (1×1) structures on SrTiO3(001) substrates—a phenomenon we term sublattice dichotomy. This dichotomy can be quantitatively explained by a parity-breaking superconducting state, characterized by the coexistence of conventional pairing and interband odd-parity pairing. The interband singlet pairing arises due to the lack of inversion symmetry, which is naturally broken from the interface coupling between the FeSe and TiO2 layer.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

65Pressure not reportedonset
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers