Unconventional superconducting correlations in fermionic many-body scars
Kiryl Pakrouski, K. V. Samokhin
DOI 10.1103/gjvn-lf4r · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Weak ergodicity breaking in interacting quantum systems may occur because of the existence of a subspace dynamically decoupled from the rest of the Hilbert space. In two-orbital spinful lattice systems, we construct such subspaces that are, in addition, distinguished by strongest interorbital and spin-singlet or spin-triplet, long-range superconducting pairing correlations. All unconventional pairing types we consider are local in space and unitary. Alternatively to orbitals, the additional degree of freedom could originate from the presence of two layers or through any other mechanism. Required Hamiltonians are rather non-exotic and include chemical potential, Hubbard, and spin-orbit interactions typically used for two-orbital superconducting materials. Each subspace is spanned by a family of group-invariant quantum many-body scars combining both 2e and 4e pairing/clustering contributions. One of the basis states has the form of a BCS wavefunction and can always be made the ground state by adding a mean-field pairing potential. Analytical results in this work are lattice-, dimension-, and (mostly) system size-independent. We confirm them by exact numerical diagonalization in small systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UGe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URhGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UCoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Current fluctuations in unconventional superconductor junctions with impurity scattering
similarity 0.97Pablo Burset et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cross-Correlated Responses of Topological Superconductors and Superfluids
similarity 0.96Kentaro Nomura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticles and vortices in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.96O. Vafek et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unpaired Majorana fermions in a layered topological superconductor
similarity 0.96Babak Seradjeh & Eytan Grosfeld
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Functional Superconductor Interfaces from Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry
similarity 0.96P. M. R. Brydon et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of an electronic topological transition for anisotropic low-dimensional superconductors
similarity 0.96G. G. N. Angilella et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified