← Back to search

Questioning the cuprate paradigm: Absence of superfluid density loss in several overdoped cuprates II

J. L. Tallon, J. G. Storey, J. W. Loram, J. Luo, C. Bernhard, I. Kokanović, J. R. Cooper

DOI 10.1103/l3sx-mzrq · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

For over 30 years it has been known that overdoped cuprate superconductors display a rapid fall in superfluid density (SFD) with increasing doping p along with the decline in Tc. This unconventional behavior suggests a depletion of the condensate either by increasing pairbreaking or the growth of a second nonpairing channel. One widely accepted suggestion is that the entire Tc(p) phase curve is governed by phase fluctuations arising from an already low SFD. More recently, it was proposed that the condensate arises in an incoherent charge channel that progressively gives way with overdoping to a second, coherent nonpairing channel. Here, we examine the electronic specific heat, and its field dependence, of a number of canonical cuprates and find that there is no apparent loss of SFD with overdoping. The SFD per CuO2 plaquette is found to rise progressively from p on the underdoped side towards (1+p) on the overdoped side, much the same as the Hall number. This would imply that all available carriers contribute to the condensate. If so, this could be the underlying intrinsic behavior for all generic cuprates. Our specific heat samples include (Y,Ca)Ba2Cu3O7−δ, YBa2Cu4O8, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, La2−xSrxCuO4, Tl0.5Pb0.5Sr2Ca1−xYxCu2O7, and Tl2Ba2CuO6, with the latter being the only clear exception. The question arises as to why. Notably, any nongeneric behavior seems to be confined to the region beyond critical doping where the pseudogap closes.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

80Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu4O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Y0.8Ca0.2Ba2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl0.5Pb0.5Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers