← Back to search

Skyrmion versus vortex flux lattices in p-wave superconductors

Qi Li, John Toner, D. Belitz

arXiv:0711.4154 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.014517 · 2007-11-27 · Physical Review B

T39 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

p-wave superconductors allow for topological defects known as skyrmions, in addition to the usual vortices that are possible in both s-wave and p-wave materials. In strongly type-II superconductors in a magnetic field, a skyrmion flux lattice yields a lower free energy than the Abrikosov flux lattice of vortices, and should thus be realized in p-wave superconductors. We analytically calculate the energy per skyrmion, which agrees very well with numerical results. From this, we obtain the magnetic induction B as a function of the external magnetic field H, and the elastic constants of the skyrmion lattice, near the lower critical field H_c1. Together with the Lindemann criterion, these results suffice to predict the melting curve of the skyrmion lattice. We find a striking difference in the melting curves of vortex lattices and skyrmion lattices: while the former is separated at all temperatures from the Meissner phase by a vortex liquid phase, the skyrmion lattice phase shares a direct boundary with the Meissner phase. That is, skyrmions lattices never melt near Hc1, while vortex lattices always melt sufficiently close to Hc1. This allows for a very simple test for the existence of a skyrmion lattice. Possible muSR experiments to detect skyrmion lattices are also discussed.

Similar papers