Josephson junctions in narrow thin-film strips
Maayan Moshe, V. G. Kogan, R. G. Mints
arXiv:0802.2783 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.020510 · 2008-02-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the field dependence of the maximum supercurrent in narrow edge-type thin-film Josephson junctions. It is assumed that the junction extends across thin-film strip of width W that is much less than the Pearl length; the film thickness is much less than the London penetration depth. We calculate the maximum supercurrent within nonlocal Josephson electrodynamics, which takes into account the stray fields affecting tunneling currents. In the case when W is much less than the thin-film Josephson length, the phase difference along the junction depends only on the junction geometry and the applied field, but is independent of the Josephson critical current density, i.e., it is universal. Zeros of the maximum supercurrent are equidistant only in large fields (unlike the case of junctions with bulk banks); they are spaced by a field that is much smaller than the one of bulk junctions. Peaks of the maximum supercurrent decrease inversely proportional to the square root of the applied field, i.e., slower than 1/H for the bulk.
Similar papers
On the theory of Josephson effect in a diffusive tunnel junction
similarity 0.90E. V. Bezuglyi et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9903344
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Periodic alternating -junction structures as realization of -Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90A. Buzdin & A. Koshelev · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305142
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junction with magnetic-field tunable current-phase relation
similarity 0.89A. Lipman et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.4057
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect in a multi-orbital model for SrRuO
similarity 0.89Kohei Kawai et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.01918
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Response of thin-film SQUIDs to applied fields and vortex fields: Linear SQUIDs
similarity 0.89John R. Clem & Ernst Helmut Brandt · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junction with magnetic-field tunable ground state
similarity 0.88E. Goldobin et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.2326
Source status unknown — claims are unverified