Josephson effect in a multi-orbital model for Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$
Kohei Kawai, Keiji Yada, Yukio Tanaka, Yasuhiro Asano, A. A. Golubov, Satoshi Kashiwaya
arXiv:1702.01918 · 2017-02-07
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study Josephson current between s-wave/spin-triplet superconductor junctions by taking into account details of band structures in Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$ such as three conduction bands, spin-orbit interaction in the bulk and that at the interface. We assume five superconducting order parameters in Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$: a chiral p-wave symmetry and four helical p-wave symmetries. We calculate current-phase relationship $I(\varphi)$ in these junctions, where $\varphi$ is the macroscopic phase difference between two superconductors. The results for a chiral p-wave pairing symmetry show that $\cos(\varphi)$ term appears in the current-phase relation due to time-reversal symmetry (TRS) breaking. On the other hand, $\cos(\varphi)$ term is absent in the helical pairing states which preserve the TRS. We also study the dependence of maximum Josephson current $I_c$ on an external magnetic flux $Φ$ in a corner junction. The calculated results of $I_c(Φ)$ show a relation $I_{c}(Φ) \neq I_{c}(-Φ)$ in a chiral state and $I_{c}(Φ)=I_{c}(-Φ)$ in a helical state. We calculate $I_c(Φ)$ in a corner and a symmetric SQUIDs geometry. In a symmetric SQUID geometry, the relation $I_{c}(Φ)=I_{c}(-Φ)$ is satisfied for all the pairing states and it is impossible to distinguish chiral state from helical one. On the other hand, results for a corner SQUID always show $I_{c}(Φ) \neq I_{c}(-Φ)$ and $I_{c}(Φ)=I_{c}(-Φ)$ for a chiral and a helical states, respectively. Experimental tests of these relations in a corner junctions and SQUIDs may serve as a tool for unambiguous determination of the pairing symmetry in Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Josephson effect in a multiorbital model for Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.94Kohei Kawai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson interferometer in a ring topology as a symmetry prove of Sr_2RuO_4
similarity 0.90Y. Asano et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0502082
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Constraints on the superconducting state of SrRuO from elastocaloric measurements
similarity 0.89Grgur Palle et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.07182
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low temperature electronic properties of Sr_2RuO_4 II: Superconductivity
similarity 0.89Ralph Werner · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0208307
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 due to orbital and spin fluctuations: Analyses by two-dimensional renormalization group theory and self-consistent vertex-correction method
similarity 0.89Masahisa Tsuchiizu et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1503.01352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle Interference of the van-Hove singularity in SrRuO
similarity 0.89A. Kreisel et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.06188
Source status unknown — claims are unverified