High fidelity universal set of quantum gates using non-adiabatic rapid passage
R. Li, M. Hoover, F. Gaitan
arXiv:0802.3543 · DOI 10.26421/QIC9.3-4-7 · 2008-02-24 · Quantum Inf. Comput.
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Numerical simulation results are presented which suggest that a class of non-adiabatic rapid passage sweeps first realized experimentally in 1991 should be capable of implementing a universal set of quantum gates G_{u} that operate with high fidelity. The gates constituting G_{u} are the Hadamard and NOT gates, together with variants of the phase, π/8, and controlled-phase gates. The universality of G_{u} is established by showing that it can construct the universal set consisting of Hadamard, phase, π/8, and controlled-NOT gates. Sweep parameter values are provided which simulations indicate will produce the different gates in G_{u}, and for which the gate error probability P_{e} satisfies: (i) P_{e} < 10^{-4} for the one-qubit gates; and (ii) P_{e} < 1.27x 10^{-3} for the modified controlled-phase gate. The sweeps in this class are non-composite and generate controllable quantum interference effects that allow the gates in G_{u} to operate non-adiabatically while maintaining high fidelity. These interference effects have been observed using NMR, and it has previously been shown how these rapid passage sweeps can be applied to atomic systems using electric fields. Here we show how these sweeps can be applied to both superconducting charge and flux qubit systems. The simulations suggest that the universal set of gates G_{u} produced by these rapid passage sweeps shows promise as possible elements of a fault-tolerant scheme for quantum computing.
Similar papers
Time-optimal performance of Josephson charge qubits: A process tomography approach
similarity 0.90Robert Roloff & Walter Pötz · 2009 · arXiv:0906.3294
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum computation with Josephson-qubits by using a current-biased information bus
similarity 0.89L. F. Wei et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Site-wise manipulations and Mott insulator-superfluid transition of interacting photons using superconducting circuit simulators
similarity 0.89Xiuhao Deng et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1410.8458
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Circuit QED with a Flux Qubit Strongly Coupled to a Coplanar Transmission Line Resonator
similarity 0.88T. Lindstrom et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0704.0727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Circuit Architecture for Digital-Analog Quantum Computing
similarity 0.88J. Yu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.15696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficient flip-chip and on-chip-based modulation of flux-tunable superconducting resonators
similarity 0.88Achintya Paradkar et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.23119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified