Origins of large critical temperature variations in single layer cuprates
A. D. Palczewski, T. Kondo, R. Khasanov, N. N. Kolesnikov, A. V. Timonina, E. Rotenberg, T. Ohta, A. Bendounan, Y. Sassa, A. V. Fedorov, S. Pailh/'es, A. F. Santander-Syro, J. Chang, M. Shi, J. Mesot, H. M. Fretwell, A. Kaminski
arXiv:0806.3779 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.054523 · 2008-06-23 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the electronic structures of two single layer superconducting cuprates, Tl$_2$Ba$_2$CuO$_{6+δ}$ (Tl2201) and (Bi$_{1.35}$Pb$_{0.85}$)(Sr$_{1.47}$La$_{0.38}$)CuO$_{6+δ}$ (Bi2201) which have very different maximum critical temperatures (90K and 35K respectively) using Angular Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy (ARPES). We are able to identify two main differences in their electronic properties. First, the shadow band that is present in double layer and low T$_{c,max}$ single layer cuprates is absent in Tl2201. Recent studies have linked the shadow band to structural distortions in the lattice and the absence of these in Tl2201 may be a contributing factor in its T$_{c,max}$.Second, Tl2201's Fermi surface (FS) contains long straight parallel regions near the anti-node, while in Bi2201 the anti-nodal region is much more rounded. Since the size of the superconducting gap is largest in the anti-nodal region, differences in the band dispersion at the anti-node may play a significant role in the pairing and therefore affect the maximum transition temperature.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (Bi1.35Pb0.85)(Sr1.47La0.38)CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Variation of Superconducting Transition Temperature in Hole-Doped Copper-Oxides
similarity 0.89X. J. Chen & H. Q. Lin · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0306680
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-doping effect arising from electron correlations in multi-layer cuprates
similarity 0.89Kazutaka Nishiguchi et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.04867
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Band Structure of Overdoped Cuprate Superconductors: Density Functional Theory Matching Experiments
similarity 0.88K. P. Kramer et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.00301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossover from Collective to Incoherent Spin Excitations in Superconducting Cuprates Probed by Detuned Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering
similarity 0.88M. Minola et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.00663
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Missing Quasiparticles and the Chemical Potential Puzzle in the Doping Evolution of the Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.88K. M. Shen et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407002
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.88Oystein Fischer et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610672
Source status unknown — claims are unverified