← Back to search

Superconductivity and Crystal Structures of (Ba1-xKx)Fe2As2 (x = 0 - 1)

Marianne Rotter, Michael Pangerl, Marcus Tegel, Dirk Johrendt

arXiv:0807.4096 · DOI 10.1002/anie.200803641 · 2008-07-25 · Angewandte Chemie

T1experimental283 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report on doping dependencies of structural parameters and superconducting transition temperatures in the solid solution (Ba1-xKx)Fe2As2. As the main effect of doping on the crystal structure, we find linear decreasing As-Fe-As bond angles and Fe-Fe distances, equivalent to an elongation of the FeAs4 tetrahedra along [001]. The structural changes are intimately coupled to the electronic states at the Fermi level, because the most relevant Fe-3dx2-y2 orbitals are strongly affected by the As-Fe-As bond angle. Superconductivity is present over the whole doping range in (Ba1-xKx)Fe2As2 with a maximum Tc of 38 K at x ~ 0.4. The superconducting transitions in the orthorhombic compounds (Ba0.9K0.1)Fe2As2 (Tc ~ 3 K) and (Ba0.8K0.2)Fe2As2 (Tc ~ 25 K) is strong evidence for the coexistence of superconductivity with the structurally distorted and potentially magnetically ordered state in the BaFe2As2 family of iron arsenide superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
(Ba1-xKx)Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38Pressure not reportedunknown
(Ba0.9K0.1)Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3Pressure not reportedunknown
(Ba0.8K0.2)Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers