Qubit dispersive readout scheme with a microstrip squid amplifier
Sebastien Michotte
arXiv:0812.0220 · 2008-12-01 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A flux qubit readout scheme involving a dispersive technique coupled to a microstrip squid amplifier has been tested experimentally. Thanks to the almost quantum limited noise of this amplifier at low temperature, this readout device is very promising for a design with actual qubits. It's proof of principle and low noise performance have been tested by simulating the qubit presence applying a tiny flux change in the input squid. The resonant frequency of the amplifier is adjusted in-situ with a varactor diode to approach the frequency of the tank circuit. Depending on the sign of the transfer function, two operating mode (crossing or anticrossing regime) have been identified.
Similar papers
Flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifiers: Hysteretic flux response and nondegenerate gain measurements
similarity 0.88Stefan Pogorzalek et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1609.09041
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive readout of a flux qubit at the single photon level
similarity 0.88J. E. Johnson et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.2858
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A dispersive nanoSQUID magnetometer for ultra-low noise, high bandwidth flux detection
similarity 0.87E. M. Levenson-Falk et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.3184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive readout scheme for a Josephson phase qubit
similarity 0.87T. Wirth et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.0954
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier
similarity 0.87M. Hatridge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier
similarity 0.87M. Hatridge et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.2466
Source status unknown — claims are unverified