Comment on "Giant Nernst Effect due to Fluctuating Cooper Pairs in Superconductors" by M.N. Serbyn, M.A. Skvortsov, A.A. Varlamov, and V. Galitski

A. Sergeev; M. Y. Reizer; V. Mitin

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.139701

← Back to search

Comment on "Giant Nernst Effect due to Fluctuating Cooper Pairs in Superconductors" by M.N. Serbyn, M.A. Skvortsov, A.A. Varlamov, and V. Galitski

A. Sergeev, M. Y. Reizer, V. Mitin

arXiv:0906.2389 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.139701 · 2009-06-12

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In a recent Letter, Serbyn et al. [A] investigated thermomagnetic effects above the superconducting transition and generalized previous works for arbitrary magnetic fields and temperatures. While the results of [A] have been confirmed in [B], we have strong objections: (i) According to our results [C], the linear response calculation does not require any correction from the magnetization currents; (ii) The result of [A,B] is giant, because unlike the normal Fermi liquid, it is of zero order in the particle-hole asymmetry. Changing the interaction constant in the Cooper channel leads to ridiculously large results even for nonsuperconducting metals; (iii)Derived in [A] the Einstein-type relation for thermomagnetic coefficient contradicts to text-book results. [A] M.N. Serbyn, M.A. Skvortsov, A.A. Varlamov, V. Galitski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067001 (2009). [B] K. Michaeli and A.M. Finkel'stein, EPL 86, 27007 (2009). [C] A. Sergeev et al., Phys. Rev. B 77, 064501 (2008).