"Bad Metal" Conductivity of Hard Core Bosons
Netanel H. Lindner, Assa Auerbach
arXiv:0910.4158 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.054512 · 2009-10-21 · Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Two dimensional hard core bosons suffer strong scattering in the high temperature resistive state at half filling. The dynamical conductivity is calculated using non perturbative tools such as continued fractions, series expansions and exact diagonalization. We find a large temperature range with linearly increasing resistivity and broad dynamical conductivity, signaling a breakdown of Boltzmann-Drude quasiparticle transport theory. At zero temperature, a high frequency peak in the dynamical conductivity appears above a "Higgs mass" gap, and corresponds to order parameter magnitude fluctuations. We discuss the apparent similarity between conductivity of hard core bosons and phenomenological characteristics of cuprates, including the universal scaling of Homes et. al. (Nature 430, 539 (2004)).
Similar papers
Beyond Homes scaling: disorder, the Planckian bound and a new universality
similarity 0.88D. M. Broun et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2502.13351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Dynamics and Hall Conductivity of Hard Core Bosons
similarity 0.88Netanel H. Lindner et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.4929
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nature of the Quantum Metal in a Two-Dimensional Crystalline Superconductor
similarity 0.88A. W. Tsen et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1507.08639
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallic transport of hard core bosons
similarity 0.88Sauri Bhattacharyya et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.14479
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal and electrical transport in metals and superconductors across antiferromagnetic and topological quantum transitions
similarity 0.88Shubhayu Chatterjee et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.02329
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong- versus Weak-Coupling Paradigms for Cuprate Superconductivity
similarity 0.87Shahaf Asban et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.0601
Source status unknown — claims are unverified