Strong- versus Weak-Coupling Paradigms for Cuprate Superconductivity
Shahaf Asban, Meni Shay, Muntaser Naamneh, Tal Kirzhner, Amit Keren
arXiv:1308.0601 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.88.060502 · 2013-08-02 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Absolute resistivity measurements as a function of temperature from optimally doped YBa_2Cu_3O_(7), La_(2-x)Sr_xCuO_4, Bi_2Sr_2CaCu_2O_(8-x), and (Ca_0.1La_0.9)(Ba_1.65La_0.35)Cu_3O_y thin films are reported. Special attention is given to the measurement geometrical factors and the resistivity slope between Tc and T^{*}. The results are compared with a strong coupling theory for the resistivity derivative near T_c, which is based on hard core bosons (HCB), and with several weak coupling theories, which are BCS based. Surprisingly, our results agree with both paradigms. The implications of these findings and the missing calculations needed to distinguish between the two paradigms are discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2Ca1Cu2O8-x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (Ca0.1La0.9)(Ba1.65La0.35)Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Strong- versus weak-coupling paradigms for cuprate superconductivity
similarity 0.92Shahaf Asban et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of doping on thermally excited quasiparticles in the high- superconducting state
similarity 0.90T. Xiang & C. Panagopoulos · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910098
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why phase diagrams of different underdoped cuprates are remarkably different? Disorder versus bilayer
similarity 0.88O. P. Sushkov · 2008 · arXiv:0808.2094
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards a global theory for the high T_c cuprates: Explanation of the puzzling optical properties
similarity 0.88J. Ashkenazi · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506515
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal Correlation between Critical Temperature of Superconductivity and band structure features
similarity 0.88Yang Liu et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.12171
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of carrier concentration on the superfluid density of high-T_c cuprates
similarity 0.88C. Panagopoulos et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9903117
Source status unknown — claims are unverified