Particle-Hole Symmetry Breaking in the Pseudogap State of Bi2201
M. Hashimoto, R. -H. He, K. Tanaka, J. P. Testaud, W. Meevasana, R. G. Moore, D. H. Lu, H. Yao, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, T. P. Devereaux, Z. Hussain, Z. -X. Shen
arXiv:0911.0197 · DOI 10.1038/nphys1632 · 2009-11-01 · Nature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In conventional superconductors, a gap exists in the energy absorption spectrum only below the transition temperature (Tc), corresponding to the energy price to pay for breaking a Cooper pair of electrons. In high-Tc cuprate superconductors above Tc, an energy gap called the pseudogap exists, and is controversially attributed either to pre-formed superconducting pairs, which would exhibit particle-hole symmetry, or to competing phases which would typically break it. Scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) studies suggest that the pseudogap stems from lattice translational symmetry breaking and is associated with a different characteristic spectrum for adding or removing electrons (particle-hole asymmetry). However, no signature of either spatial or energy symmetry breaking of the pseudogap has previously been observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Here we report ARPES data from Bi2201 which reveals both particle-hole symmetry breaking and dramatic spectral broadening indicative of spatial symmetry breaking without long range order, upon crossing through T* into the pseudogap state. This symmetry breaking is found in the dominant region of the momentum space for the pseudogap, around the so-called anti-node near the Brillouin zone boundary. Our finding supports the STM conclusion that the pseudogap state is a broken-symmetry state that is distinct from homogeneous superconductivity.
Similar papers
STM imaging of symmetry-breaking structural distortion in the Bi-based cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Ilija Zeljkovic et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1104.4342
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting energy gap versus pseudogap in hole-doped cuprates as revealed by infrared spectroscopy
similarity 0.90T. Dong et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.6170
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photoemission perspective on pseudogap, superconducting fluctuations, and charge order in cuprates: a review of recent progress
similarity 0.90Inna Vishik · 2018 · arXiv:1803.11228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exploring Strongly Interacting Gapless States: Cuprates, Pair Density Waves, and Fluctuating Superconductivity
similarity 0.90Zhehao Dai · 2020 · arXiv:2005.12285
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap, Superconducting Gap, and Fermi Arc in High-Tc Cuprates Revealed by Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
similarity 0.90Teppei Yoshida et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.0600
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Temperature Superconductivity: the explanation
similarity 0.89A. S. Alexandrov · 2011 · arXiv:1102.2082
Source status unknown — claims are unverified