← Back to search

Effect of stripe order strength for the Nernst effect in La_{2-x}Sr_xCu_4 single crystals

Takenori Fujii, Tomonori Matsushima, Toshihide Maruoka, Atsushi Asamitsu

arXiv:0912.0095 · DOI 10.1016/j.physc.2009.12.021 · 2009-12-01 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications

T1theoretical8 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have precisely measured the Nernst effect in Nd-doped La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ single crystals with controlling the strength (stability) of the stripe order. We found that the onset temperature $T_{onset}$, where the Nernst signal starts increasing, does not change conspicuously in spite of Nd-doping. At low temperatures, on the other hand, the absolute value of the Nernst signal is strongly suppressed in accordance with the strength of the stripe order. These results imply that the fluctuation of (charge) stripe order enhances the Nernst signal below $T_{onset}$ at high temperatures, and then the stripe order enhanced by Nd-doping suppresses the superconducting fluctuation to reduce the Nernst signal at low temperatures. We also observed an increase of the Nernst signal below the charge order temperature $T_{ch}$ which is observed in diffraction measurement.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.85Sr0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

37Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.65Nd0.2Sr0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

23Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.45Nd0.4Sr0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

12Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers