Transport and superconducting properties of Fe-based superconductors: SmFeAs(O1-x Fx) versus Fe1+y (Te1-x, Sex)
M. Tropeano, I. Pallecchi, M. R. Cimberle, C. Ferdeghini, G. Lamura, M. Vignolo, A. Martinelli, A. Palenzona, M. Putti
arXiv:0912.0395 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/23/5/054001 · 2009-12-02
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present transport and superconducting properties - namely resistivity, magnetoresistivity, Hall effect, Seebeck effect, thermal conductivity, upper critical field - of two different families of Fe-based superconductors, which can be viewed in many respects as end members: SmFeAs(O1-xFx) with the largest Tc and the largest anisotropy and Fe1+y(Te1-x,Sex), with the largest Hc2, the lowest Tc and the lowest anisotropy. In the case of the SmFeAs(O1-xFx) series, we find that a single band description allows to extract an approximated estimation of band parameters such as carrier density and mobility from experimental data, although the behaviour of Seebeck effect as a function of doping demonstrates that a multiband description would be more appropriate. On the contrary, experimental data of the Fe1+y(Te1-x,Sex) series exhibit a strongly compensated behaviour, which can be described only within a multiband model. In the Fe1+y(Te1-x,Sex) series, the role of the excess Fe, tuned by Se stoichiometry, is found to be twofold: it dopes electrons in the system and it introduces localized magnetic moments, responsible for Kondo like scattering and likely pair-breaking of Cooper pairs. Hence, excess Fe plays a crucial role also in determining superconducting properties such as the Tc and the upper critical field Bc2. The huge Bc2 values of the Fe1+y(Te1-x,Sex) samples are described by a dirty limit law, opposed to the clean limit behaviour of the SmFeAs(O1-xFx) samples. Hence, magnetic scattering by excess Fe seems to drive the system in the dirty regime, but its detrimental pairbreaking role seems not to be as severe as predicted by theory. This issue has yet to be clarified, addressing the more fundamental issue of the interplay between magnetism and superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmFeAs(O1-xFx) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1+y(Te1-x,Sex) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effects of excess Fe on upper critical field and magnetotransport in Fe1+y(Te1-xSx)z
similarity 0.90Hechang Lei et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.2209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Majority carrier type inversion in FeSe family and "doped semimetal" scheme in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89Y. A. Ovchenkov et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.03551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic properties of single-crystalline FeTe and FeSeTe
similarity 0.88G. F. Chen et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0811.1489
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron correlation effects and scattering rates in FeTeSe superconductor
similarity 0.88S. Thirupathaiah et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.00424
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Point-contact Andreev-reflection spectroscopy in Fe(Te,Se) films: multiband superconductivity and electron-boson coupling
similarity 0.87D. Daghero et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.4667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity vs bound state formation in a two-band superconductor with small Fermi energy -- applications to Fe-pnictides/chalcogenides and doped SrTiO3
similarity 0.87Andrey V Chubukov et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1601.01678
Source status unknown — claims are unverified