Why holes are not like electrons. IV. Hole undressing and spin current in the superconducting state
J. E. Hirsch
arXiv:1002.2688 · DOI 10.1142/S0217979210055834 · 2010-02-14 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In paper III of this series (arXiv:0901.3612) we proposed a scenario of superconductivity driven by hole "undressing" that involved a complete redistribution of the occupation of single particle energy levels: the holes near the top of the band were proposed to all condense to the bottom of the band. Here we consider a less drastic redistribution involving electrons with a definite spin chirality and show that it is in fact energetically favored by the Coulomb exchange matrix element $J$ over the scenario proposed earlier. It is shown that spin splitting with chiral states reduces the Coulomb repulsion and hence that the Coulomb repulsion promotes spin splitting. Superconductors are proposed to possess a spin-split hole `core' at the bottom of the electronic conduction band in addition to a spin-split Fermi surface. The new scenario leads naturally to the existence of a spin current in the superconducting state and is consistent with the Spin Meissner effect and negative charge expulsion discussed earlier within the theory of hole superconductivity.
Similar papers
The origin of the Meissner effect in new and old superconductors
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2011 · arXiv:1201.0139
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correcting 100 years of misunderstanding: electric fields in superconductors, hole superconductivity, and the Meissner effect
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2012 · arXiv:1202.1851
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from Undressing
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007115
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why holes are not like electrons. III. How holes in the normal state turn into electrons in the superconducting state
similarity 0.88Hirsch, J. E. · 2010 · arXiv:0901.3612
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The London moment: what a rotating superconductor reveals about superconductivity
similarity 0.87J. E. Hirsch · 2013 · arXiv:1310.3834
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductors as giant atoms predicted by the theory of hole superconductivity
similarity 0.87J. E. Hirsch · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0301611
Source status unknown — claims are unverified