Superconductivity from Undressing
J. E. Hirsch
arXiv:cond-mat/0007115 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.14487 · 2000-07-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Photoemission experiments in high $T_c$ cuprates indicate that quasiparticles are heavily 'dressed' in the normal state, particularly in the low doping regime. Furthermore these experiments show that a gradual undressing occurs both in the normal state as the system is doped and the carrier concentration increases, as well as at fixed carrier concentration as the temperature is lowered and the system becomes superconducting. A similar picture can be inferred from optical experiments. It is argued that these experiments can be simply understood with the single assumption that the quasiparticle dressing is a function of the local carrier concentration. Microscopic Hamiltonians describing this physics are discussed. The undressing process manifests itself in both the one-particle and two-particle Green's functions, hence leads to observable consequences in photoemission and optical experiments respectively. An essential consequence of this phenomenology is that the microscopic Hamiltonians describing it break electron-hole symmetry: these Hamiltonians predict that superconductivity will only occur for carriers with hole-like character, as proposed in the theory of hole superconductivity.
Similar papers
Superconductivity from Hole Undressing
similarity 0.93J. E. Hirsch · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102136
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from undressing
similarity 0.91J. E. Hirsch
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The fundamental role of charge asymmetry in superconductivity
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407642
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductors as giant atoms: qualitative aspects
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305574
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why holes are not like electrons. IV. Hole undressing and spin current in the superconducting state
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2010 · arXiv:1002.2688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-hole asymmetry is the key to superconductivity
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0301610
Source status unknown — claims are unverified