Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
Clifford W. Hicks, John R. Kirtley, Thomas M. Lippman, Nicholas C. Koshnick, Martin E. Huber, Yoshiteru Maeno, William M. Yuhasz, M. Brian Maple, Kathryn A. Moler
arXiv:1003.2189 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 · 2010-03-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrOs4Sb12 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy
similarity 0.93Clifford W. Hicks et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of Vortex Coalescence, Vortex Chains and Crossing Vortices in the Anisotropic Spin-Triplet Superconductor
similarity 0.90K. Hasselbach et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610573
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for even parity unconventional superconductivity in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Aaron Chronister et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.13730
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of anisotropic s-wave superconductivity with point-node like gap minima: analysis of (Y,Lu)Ni_2B_2C
similarity 0.90Hiroshi Kontani · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0409564
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiband Superconductivity in Filled-Skutterudite Compounds (Pr_{1-x}La_{x})Os_{4}Sb_{12}: An Sb Nuclear-Quadruple-Resonance (NQR) Study
similarity 0.89M. Yogi et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct reduction of Knight shift in superconducting state of SrRuO under uniaxial strain
similarity 0.89Austin W. Lindquist & Hae-Young Kee · 2019 · arXiv:1912.02215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified