Two-dimensional tunneling in a SQUID
B. Ivlev
arXiv:1004.0987 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.184513 · 2010-04-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Traditionally quantum tunneling in a static SQUID is studied on the basis of a classical trajectory in imaginary time under a two-dimensional potential barrier. The trajectory connects a potential well and an outer region crossing their borders in perpendicular directions. In contrast to that main-path mechanism, a wide set of trajectories with components tangent to the border of the well can constitute an alternative mechanism of multi-path tunneling. The phenomenon is essentially non-one-dimensional. Continuously distributed paths under the barrier result in enhancement of tunneling probability. A type of tunneling mechanism (main-path or multi-path) depends on character of a state in the potential well prior to tunneling.
Similar papers
Two-dimensional tunneling in a SQUID
similarity 0.94B. Ivlev & J. P. Palomares-Báez
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic flux dynamics in critical state of one-dimensional discrete superconductor
similarity 0.89S. L. Ginzburg et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507703
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decay in an asymmetric SQUID
similarity 0.88J. P. Palomares Baez & B. Ivlev · 2010 · arXiv:1009.3309
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantitative Study of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling in a dc SQUID: A System with Two Degrees of Freedom
similarity 0.87Shao-Xiong Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of two-dimensional macroscopic quantum tunneling of a current-biased DC-SQUID
similarity 0.87F. Balestro et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0308559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multilevel resonant tunneling in the presence of flux and charge noise
similarity 0.86Anatoly Y. Smirnov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.10605
Source status unknown — claims are unverified