Different response of the crystal structure to isoelectronic doping in BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 and [Ba(1-x)Sr(x)]Fe2As2
Marianne Rotter, Christine Hieke, Dirk Johrendt
arXiv:1005.1411 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.014513 · 2010-05-09 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity up to 30 K in charge neutrally doped BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 has been ascribed to chemical pressure, caused by the shrinking unit cell. But the latter induces no superconductivity in [Ba(1-x)Sr(x)]Fe2As2 in spite of the same volume range. We show that the spin-density-wave (SDW) state of BaFe2As2 becomes suppressed in BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 by a subtle reorganization of the crystal structure, where arsenic and phosphorus are located at different coordinates z(As), z(P). High-resolution X-ray diffraction experiments with BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 single crystals reveal almost unchanged Fe-P bonds, but a contraction of the Fe-As bonds, which remain nearly unchanged in [Ba(1-x)Sr(x)]Fe2As2. Since the Fe-As bond length is a gauge for the magnetic moment, our results show why the SDW is suppressed by P-, but not by Sr-doping. Only the Fe-P interaction increases the width of the iron 3d bands, which destabilizes the magnetic SDW ground state. The simultaneous contraction of the Fe{As bonds is rather a consequence of the vanishing magnetism. Ordered structure models of BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 obtained by DFT calculations agree perfectly with the single-crystal X-ray structure determinations. The contraction of the Fe-As bonds saturates at doping levels above x = 0.3, which corrects the unreasonable linear decrease of the so-called pnictide height.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of doping on the magnetostructural ordered phase of iron arsenides: A comparative study of the resistivity anisotropy in the doped BaFeAs with doping into three different sites
similarity 0.90Shigeyuki Ishida et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.3744
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Pengcheng Dai · 2015 · arXiv:1503.02340
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Physical and magnetic properties of Ba(FeRu)As single crystals
similarity 0.90A. Thaler et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.3298
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Utilization of mechanical alloying method for flux growth of single crystalline BaFe(AsP)
similarity 0.90Kosuke Z. Takahashi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1604.08375
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The change of electronic state and crystal structure by post-annealing in superconducting SrFe2(As0.65P0.35)2
similarity 0.89T. Kobayashi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.2074
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in hole-doped (SrK)FeAs
similarity 0.89G. F. Chen et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.1209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified