← Back to search

Stripe antiferromagnetic correlations in LaFeAsO1-xFx probed by 75As NMR

Shunsaku Kitagawa, Yusuke Nakai, Tetsuya Iye, Kenji Ishida, Yoichi Kamihara, Masahiro Hirano, Hideo Hosono

arXiv:1005.2013 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.212502 · 2010-05-12 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical30 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The anisotropy of the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_{1}$ of $^{75}$As was investigated in the iron-based superconductor LaFeAs(O$_{1-x}$F$_{x}$) ($x = 0.07, 0.11$ and 0.14) as well as LaFeAsO. While the temperature dependence of the normal-state $1/T_1T$ in the superconducting (SC) $x = 0.07$ is different from that in the SC $x = 0.11$, their anisotropy of $1/T_1$, $R \equiv (1/T_{1})_{H \parallel ab}/(1/T_{1})_{H \parallel c}$ in the normal state is almost the same ($\simeq$ 1.5). The observed anisotropy is ascribable to the presence of the local stripe correlations with $Q = (π, 0)$ or $(0, π)$. In contrast, $1/T_1$ is isotropic and $R$ is approximately 1 in the overdoped $x = 0.14$ sample, where superconductivity is almost suppressed. These results suggest that the presence of the local stripe correlations originating from the nesting between hole and electron Fermi surfaces is linked to high-$T_c$ superconductivity in iron pnictides.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LaFeAsO0.93F0.07

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

21.8Pressure not reportedonset
LaFeAsO0.89F0.11

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25.2Pressure not reportedonset
LaFeAsO0.86F0.14

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.7Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers