Comment on "Unconventional s-wave superconductivity in Fe(Se,Te)"
I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh
arXiv:1007.0047 · 2010-06-30
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Hanaguri et al (Science, 8th of January 2010, p. 181) have reported STM measurements on an Fe-based superconductor Fe(Se,Te). After Fourier-transforming their data they found three sets of sharp peaks in the reciprocal space. They interpreted one as a Bragg peak (an umklapp scattering) and two as resulting from quasiparticle interference (QPI) We point out that at least one of these two peaks is also a Bragg peak, corresponding to another reciprocal lattice vector, and therefore is not a QPI peak, and the third peak has similar structure, too sharp for a QPI peak in a nodeless superconductor with an isotropic gap, proposed by Hanaguri et al. We argue that this peak must also be a Bragg peak related to a surface reconstruction doubling the unit cell. We also calculate the QPI pattern, assuming an isotropic gap, and find that indeed it is quite different from the experiment. Finally, we speculate about possible origin of the magnetic field dependence of the Bragg peaks in this compound.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe(Se,Te) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Fe-doping induced superconductivity in charge-density-wave system 1T-TaS2
similarity 0.93L. J. Li et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.3962
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Order versus superconductivity in the Iron-based layered La(O1-xFx)FeAs systems
similarity 0.92Clarina de la Cruz et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0804.0795
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetization asymmetry of type-II superconductors in high magnetic fields
similarity 0.92D. M. Gokhfeld et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.4650
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
MAGNETIC ANOMALY IN SUPERCONDUCTING FeSe
similarity 0.91D. Mendoza et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.1966
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic flux penetration and AC loss in a composite superconducting wire with ferromagnetic parts
similarity 0.90F. Gömöry et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.1790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Nanowires as Nonlinear Inductive Elements for Qubits
similarity 0.89Jaseung Ku et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.3951
Source status unknown — claims are unverified