Attractive vortex interaction and the intermediate-mixed state of superconductors
Ernst Helmut Brandt, Mukunda P. Das
arXiv:1007.1107 · DOI 10.1007/S10948-010-1046-8 · 2010-07-07 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic vortices in superconductors usually repel each other. Several cases are discussed when the vortex interaction has an attractive tail and thus a minimum, leading to vortex clusters and chains. Decoration pictures then typically look like in the intermediate state of type-I superconductors, showing lamellae or islands of Meissner state or surrounded by Meissner state, but with the normal regions filled with Abrikosov vortices that are typical for type-II superconductors in the mixed state. Such intermediate-mixed state was observed and investigated in detail in pure Nb, TaN and other materials 40 years ago; last year it was possibly also observed in MgB$_2$, where it was called "a totally new state" and ascribed to the existence of two superconducting electron bands, one of type-I and one of type-II. The complicated electronic structure of MgB$_2$ and its consequences for superconductivity and vortices are discussed. It is shown that for the real superconductor MgB$_2$ which possesses a single transition temperature, the assumption of two independent order parameters with separate penetration depths and separate coherence lengths is unphysical.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PbIn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The Vortex Lattice in Ginzburg-Landau Superconductors
similarity 0.95Ernst Helmut Brandt · 2008 · arXiv:0806.1058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamics of Superconductors Exposed to High Frequency Fields
similarity 0.92Brandt, Ernst Helmut · 2010 · arXiv:1008.2231
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interaction between multi components vortices at arbitrary distances using a variational method in the Ginzburg-Landau theory
similarity 0.91Hadi Lookzadeh & S. Deldar · 2014 · arXiv:1408.3834
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Casimir Force between Vortex Matter in Anisotropic and Layered Superconductors
similarity 0.90H. G. Katzgraber et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9811343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interaction Between Two Single Superconducting Vortices Inside A Superconducting Hollow Cylindrical domain
similarity 0.90Diego García Ovalle et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.03419
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex phase diagram for mesoscopic superconducting disks
similarity 0.90V. A. Schweigert et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806013
Source status unknown — claims are unverified