Fundamental studies of superconductors using scanning magnetic imaging
J. R. Kirtley
arXiv:1008.3179 · DOI 10.1088/0034-4885/73/12/126501 · 2010-08-18 · Reports on Progress in Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this review I discuss the application of scanning magnetic imaging to fundamental studies of superconductors, concentrating on three scanning magnetic microscopies - scanning SQUID microscopy (SSM), scanning Hall bar microscopy (SHM), and magnetic force microscopy (MFM). I briefly discuss the history, sensitivity, spatial resolution, invasiveness, and potential future developments of each technique. I then discuss a selection of applications of these microscopies.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic imaging of Pearl vortices
similarity 0.91F. Tafuri et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0402667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner response of a bulk superconductor with an embedded sheet of reduced penetration depth
similarity 0.91J. R. Kirtley et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.1032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Realistic Pearl vortices in thin film superconductors
similarity 0.90Aurélien Balzli et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.09440
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Screening and Topological Order in Thin Superconducting Films
similarity 0.89E. C. Marino et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.01310
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Josephson junction as a quantum engine
similarity 0.89Robert Alicki et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.04762
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detecting Current Noise with a Josephson Junction in the Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling Regime
similarity 0.89J. T. Peltonen et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611593
Source status unknown — claims are unverified